DWI Breath Test Intoxilyzer Source Code Documents: State v. Brunner, Minnesota Supreme Court (2009)

I have previously posted an index of the documents my firm submits in each source code case.  Now that the Minnesota Supreme Court has ruled in State v. Brunner, upholding a trial court's ruling to suppress an Intoxilyzer 5000 breath test result, other attorneys are contacting me for the documents used in that case. 

I have posted a number of the Intoxilyzer Breath Test documents on my website.

The Supreme Court held the standard for discovery of the source code is that a driver must show the software is merely related to the defendant's guilty or innocence.  Brunner submitted only two substantive documents, which met that standard.

Here are links to the documents Attorney Derek Patrin used in State v. Brunner.
 
 
 
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.mndwidefenseblog.com/admin/trackback/130111
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.